Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Iraq: President vs Study Group
The comment here is actually fairly limited.
Why did the President agree to a Bi-Partisan commission lead by one of his daddy's good friends if he had no intention of changing his policy on the handling of Iraq?
For that matter, why did he appoint a member of that study group as his Secretary of Defense to replace Secretary Rumsfeld, if he was going to continue on the same course?
This President really confuses me, he 'acts' like he is going to make changes but then he just does the same thing over and over. Isn't he just proving that he meets the 'classic' definition of insanity? (You know, doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.)
I also read some place along the way in the last 24 hours that Mr. Bush is in Crawford for a vacation and that one of the things that he is doing is 'contemplating a change in direction in Iraq.' I guess I will believe it when I see it.
Why did the President agree to a Bi-Partisan commission lead by one of his daddy's good friends if he had no intention of changing his policy on the handling of Iraq?
For that matter, why did he appoint a member of that study group as his Secretary of Defense to replace Secretary Rumsfeld, if he was going to continue on the same course?
This President really confuses me, he 'acts' like he is going to make changes but then he just does the same thing over and over. Isn't he just proving that he meets the 'classic' definition of insanity? (You know, doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.)
I also read some place along the way in the last 24 hours that Mr. Bush is in Crawford for a vacation and that one of the things that he is doing is 'contemplating a change in direction in Iraq.' I guess I will believe it when I see it.
Labels: President W
// posted by Little Wolf @ Wednesday, December 27, 2006 
